View all our reports

The 2021 Australian Infrastructure Plan is a practical and actionable roadmap for infrastructure reform.

A Pathway to Infrastructure Resilience recommends a whole-of-system, all-hazards approach to resilience planning that focuses on strengthening an infrastructure asset, network and sector, as well as the place, precinct, city, and region that the infrastructure operates within.

Capturing Value: Advice on making value capture work in Australia is the first of Infrastructure Australia’s Reform Series. It provides guidance to governments and the private sector on how value capture can be applied in the Australian context.

The February 2016 update to the Infrastructure Priority List was released on 17 February 2016 along with the 15 year Australian Infrastructure Plan.

The first Australian Infrastructure Plan provides a positive reform and investment roadmap for Australia. The Plan sets out the infrastructure challenges and opportunities Australia faces over the next 15 years and the solutions required to drive

Progress and Action is Infrastructure Australia's fourth annual report to the Council of Australian Governments. It presents current opportunities and challenges and recommends reforms in key areas of transport, water, energy and telecommunications. It also contains the infrastructure report card 2011–12 and the 2012 Infrastructure Priority List.

This draft report sets out a summary of findings of a review of the balance sheet capacities of eight Australian ports carried out by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.

This paper provides background information on the development of the national ports strategy.

This publication is the collection of appendices to the review of regional water quality and security conducted by AECOM for Infrastructure Australia.

This review by AECOM for Infrastructure Australia was initiated in response to a demonstrable need for action to improve water quality and water security outcomes for smaller regional towns. Focusing on utilities that serve towns with populations of between 2,000 and 15,000 residents, it looked at systemic and institutional constraints that were seen as barriers to supplying high quality drinking water and achieving supply security.